Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Note: The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.
Vehicle: 2003 Nissan 350Z Touring 6-Speed
4.5
Miles Driven on Tires: 100
Location: Newark, DE
Driving Condition: Combined Highway/City
Driving Style: Average
Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110
Follow-Up Review: 5,500 miles on tires
October 05, 2011
So far I have Driven about 6000 miles on these tires, and I have no complaints what so ever. they are better then the Direzza 101's and the stock Bridgestones. I just hope they don't wear out too quick.
Initial Review: 100 miles on tires
July 26, 2011

I just purchased these tires and had them mounted in a monsoon! It honestly didn't matter; these tires handled better in pouring rain then any tire I have ever owned in any car. I have not past the break in period yet, and I am already pleased. Once I get some wear, tear and some mileage built up on them I will give another review. As it stands, they grip better then my stock Bridgestone Potenza RE040 and Dunlop Direzza DZ101's. They are less noisy then the Potenza's (which makes sense due to the hard rubber the Bridgestone's use) and better in every aspect then the Dunlop's minus noise. For the price this seems like a solid buy, so far....

Read More Reviews
By Vehicle | By Tire

Leave a comment





Captcha