Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Thursday, April 12, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110Reviewer's Overall Rating: 7

1993 Nissan 240SX
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 30,000
Location: Raleigh, NC
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 30,000 Miles on Tires
April 02, 2012

I have a 93 s13 hatch, with coilovers and all the suspension goodies, these tires were put on my car with 17x9 +25 wheels. I have to say I am very impressed for the price these tires are almost bald now because of back road fun after 30k miles, and they still perform very well, still hydroplane resistance is good and traction is still superb, now that being said these tires could have lasted a lot longer but because of alignment issues -1.5F/ 2.5R, they do have inner wear and a busted belt because of crappy NC roads and stiff suspension, but if anyone asked me a cheap good performing tire these would be it, road noise did become an issue after 15k but I dont drive a benz or a bmw so i could care less. The car has been on the track at VIR and they handled beyond my expectations for this price range, If your looking at this tire I'd say go for it, if you plan on driving these hard in corners in rain dont push it, but in a straight line going 80mph on the hwy in the rain theyre fine, HAPPY SHOPPING

Comments on Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Hankook Ventus V12 evo K110

Leave a comment





Captcha