Tire Rack's Best Tires for the Honda Odyssey

Monday, May 7, 2012 by Steve Huffman

For over a decade, the Honda Odyssey has been one of America's top selling minivans. With its good looks, spacious interior and Honda's reliability, the Odyssey has logged millions of miles on U.S. roads. Along for the ride are some very good choices of tires, including the most common size of 235/65R16.
 

Having spoken with hundreds of Odyssey owners and having made several more recommendations, I've found three tires that have been solid choices.


Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
Goodyear Assurance ComforTredTouring
Continental CrossContact LX20
Continental CrossContact
LX20 with EcoPlus Technology
Hankook Optimo H727
Hankook Optimo
H727


My favorite option is the Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring. This tire is one on the best riding tires I have ever driven on. Period. It offers the qualities most drivers are looking for in a tire: very smooth, quiet, great all-season traction and will last a long time.
 

Next, the Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology is an ecologically friendly tire that's designed to enhance driving pleasure, save fuel and maintain grip while on wet surfaces. Technically, the tire is marketed as a Crossover/SUV Touring All-Season tire, but works just as well on the Honda Odyssey. This tire is also very comfortable and offers excellent traction. The difference with this tire is its low rolling resistance technology that provides drivers with a little better fuel economy.
 

When in comes to a value option, I prefer the Hankook Optimo H727. This tire offers good all-season traction and reasonable ride manners. It's developed to deliver a premium appearance and long wear along with dry, wet and wintertime traction, even in light snow. Optimo H727 tires also come with a 100,000-mile treadlife warranty.

Do you need additional help with selecting your new tires? Then visit our Tire Decision Guide to see which performance category best suits your driving needs.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the General Grabber HTS

Friday, May 4, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


General Grabber HTSReviewer's Overall Rating: 7.91

2005 Nissan Pathfinder SE
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 60,000
Location: North Bergen, NJ
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 60,000 Miles on Tires
May 02, 2012

I average between 24-30K a year. Anyone near NJ/NYC traffic knows drivers and conditions. I'm not a "crazy road-rager", but I'll admit that I push my cars hard and drive on the faster side. I've driven in "all" but 2 major weather conditions since 2001. It helps to know the tires limits so you have a better reaction to a random and potentially bad situation. Fast or slow you name it, it's likely happened or almost happened to me so avoiding an accident with good performance tires and brakes is a must. I prefer high performance directional tires, but at the time I was on a budget. I also didn't want to get stuck with that whole "well you got what you paid for" scenario, so I called to compare the specs between other tires and costs, etc. Coincidentally the rep I spoke with previously had these same tires on his Cherokee and I was happy with his opinion. OVERALL....60,000+ miles, "my driving" I've been pretty happy. In this SUV these tires have held their own. I won't say where or how fast but whenever I'm on particular roads(dry conditions)in my area I seriously test the "break" or "squeal" limits and I'm still pleasantly surprised. I don't push the limits in bad weather conditions, but again still pleasantly surprised. Next time around I will test out another tire, but I would definitely suggest these for anyone looking for a good quality tire at a lower price......

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Hankook Optimo H727

Monday, April 23, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


Hankook Optimo H727Reviewer's Overall Rating: 8.62

2008 Infiniti G35 Sedan
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 5,000
Location: Durham, North Carolina
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 5,000 Miles on Tires
April 22, 2012

This is an excellent all season tire and would purchase for an SUV or family sedan. However, I purchased this for my Infiniti G35 which was a mistake since I made tire wear a priority over performance. The drive quality of the Infiniti has deteriorated as these, as expected, do not handle "spiritied" driving as well, and I lose confidence around curves. I should have purchased high performance tires since the "fun" factor is now gone from the Infiniti.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Yokohama Parada Spec-X

Friday, April 20, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.

Yokohama Parada Spec-X Reviewer's Overall Rating: 8
 
 

2006 Porsche Cayenne S Titanium Edition
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle

 
Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 10,000
Location: Elgin, IL
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 10,000 Miles on Tires
April 19, 2012

I drive all over the Midwest in all types of weather, dry, rain, snow and these tires have performed great. The tread wear has been excellent, the wet and snow traction has been as good as tires I have paid twice as much for. No there don't corner like Goodyear F1's but then there are designed to. If your drive a high performance SUV and need a great tire that offer great value and performance, I don't think you can go wrong with these. My Porsche uses P295/45/20's and the tread noise is less than what I would expect from a tire of this diameter and tread width. I am sometimes confused by the reviews I read on tires I have purchased from the Tire Rack and I've bought a lot of them. My results always seem to be better than many of the reviews I read. My advice is rotate your tires if you can and for ---'s sake check your tire pressure! I can't tell you how many cars and trucks I see on the road with under inflated tires.

 

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the General Grabber AT 2

Thursday, April 12, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


General Grabber AT 2Reviewer's Overall Rating: 9.47

2008 Acura MDX
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 57,000
Location: St. Paul, VA
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 57,000 Miles on Tires
April 04, 2012

I bought these tires because of the reviews here and I could not be happier. Honestly these tires have lasted longer and performed better than any other tire I have owned. I use to only buy Michelin and BFG but these have outperformed both. I have driven through 2 feet of snow and all over the beaches in North Carolina with these and never been stuck. These tires have exceeded my expectations. The only thing that I wish they did a little bit better is throw mud from the tread. When mudding it would be helpful. I know you may laugh because I am using my Acura to do the things I do but I buy a SUV to use and abuse not just look good. The factory Michelin had to be changed at 43,000. Which is ok but these Grabber ATs did so much better. I could probably get another 5,000 miles out of them but I go offroad too much so I am going to replace them.

Bridgestone's Ecopia Tires Help You Save Fuel

Friday, April 6, 2012 by Doc Horvath

While Bridgestone's Potenza line is known for performance, Turanza tires are known for comfort. The new Ecopia line is quickly emerging as the family of tires that'll help your car go "green."
 

Ecopia tires utilize Bridgestone’s most advanced technology to produce fuel-efficient Original Equipment and replacement tires. These tires have been developed with a focus on low rolling resistance in sizes typically used on small, fuel-efficient vehicles and hybrids, but are now becoming available in some popular light truck and SUV tire sizes as well.
 

Low Rolling Resistance technology is one of several tools used to improve fuel economy in new cars (along with a focus on a vehicle's weight and aerodynamics), and is becoming a focus for many shopping for new tires. Tire Rack has recently added data loggers and vehicle trip computers to our test fleet in an effort to collect and compare fuel economy figures as part of our testing procedure.
 

Last year we tested the Dueler H/L 422 Ecopia for SUVs and the Ecopia EP422 for smaller passenger vehicles with impressive results for not only fuel economy, but comfort and handling.

For more information on choosing the right fuel-efficient tire for your vehicle, read "We Can Help You Find the Best Low Rolling Resistance Tire for Your Car."

Why is the Same Tire Listed Twice?

Friday, March 30, 2012 by Cy Chowattukunnel

While researching tires on your website, you may see the same tire listed twice. For example, in the 225/65-17 size, you'll see a $173* Michelin Latitude Tour and a $182* Michelin Latitude Tour. Are these two tires really identical? Or are there differences? One of the options (the Latitude Tour currently listed at $173) is an Original Equipment tire used on the 2012 Chevrolet Equinox LS. The other Michelin option (currently listed for $182) is the "normal" version of the Latitude Tour.
 

What are the technical differences between the two versions? With these two tires, there are differences in each tire's load carrying capacity, treadwear rating and weight. The non-Original Equipment Latitude Tour has a 100T service description, while the GM variant Latitude Tour has a 102T service description. A load index of 100 equals 1,764 lbs. of load carry capacity and 102 carries 1,874 lbs. The Original Equipment tire has a treadwear rating of 720 compared to a 600 rating on the "normal" Latitude Tour. Each tire is offered with a 65,000 mile treadwear warranty. The Latitude Tour with the 100T service description has two polyester plies and a 30 pound weight, where the GM variant Latitude Tour has one polyester sidewall ply and a 25 pound weight.
 

To summarize, both tires are similar; however the Original Equipment version of the tire should wear better and has less carrying capacity.
 

If you're replacing one or two tires, you should try to stay with the version you currently have so you have the same grip on each corner of the vehicle. When replacing four tires, either option will work, unless the O.E. variant is for a vehicle that's markedly different than yours.
 

Michelin Latitude Tour $173*
Michelin Latitude Tour $173*
Michelin Latitude Tour $182*
Michelin Latitude Tour $182*


225/65-17 Michelin Latitude Tour FAQ:

  1. The "normal" Latitude Tour is listed as being on backorder, how long will this last? Backorder means that the tire is on order, but the tire manufacturer can't provide an approximate in-stock date. We can make a projection based upon the last ship date and whether or not a production run is scheduled and past patterns. We are constantly following up with the tire manufacturers for up-to-date information. Since there is no production run scheduled, we project this tire will be available in approximately two or three months.
     
  2. I have a third-generation (2007-2011) Honda CRV, which version of the Latitude Tour do you recommend? Also, does the GM variant Latitude Tour have enough carrying capacity? I'd choose the GM variant tire because the 5 lbs. of weight savings is substantial. Fuel economy will vary with several parameters, but if everything else remains the same, shedding 5 lbs. of weight will provide a measurable improvement. 

    As far as weight carrying capacity, the CRV has a gross axle weight rating of 2,226 in the front and 2,290 on the rear. So each tire must carry 1,141 lbs. to meet minimum spec. At 1,764 lbs. (1,605 with the standard SUV and truck adjustment), either tire has more than enough capacity.

*Prices subject to change

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel Max

Thursday, March 29, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


Goodyear Assurance CS Fuel MaxReviewer's Overall Rating: 10

2009 Toyota Venza
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 1,500
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Driving Condition: Average

Initial Review, 1,500 Miles on Tires
March 16, 2012

One thing that I've found when reading tire reviews is to pay attention to the type of vehicle the reviewer is driving. I've seen tires get terrible reviews when installed on a passenger car, but get great reviews when installed on something like an SUV or minivan.

That being said, my experience with the Assurance Fuel Max (245/55-19) has been outstanding to date. Much quieter and smoother than the Bridgestone Dueler's that they replaced. No chance to drive in snow or ice, but with in the weather that I normally see here in Texas these tires have performed beautifully. If they continue with their existing performance I'll definitely buy another set of these when the time comes.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Continental ExtremeContact DWS

Thursday, March 29, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


Continental ExtremeContact DWSReviewer's Overall Rating: 9

2005 Mini Cooper S Convertible
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 3,000
Location: Pembroke Pines, FL
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 3,000 Miles on Tires
March 13, 2012

I drive A Mini Cooper S, and the previous tires were Run-Flats. One cannot compare the steering response, but I was expecting a bit firmer cornering. I inflated the tires to 39 psi, but thinking about increasing to 41psi based on some other forum reviews. The tire overall performs very well, and perhaps on other cars w/out run-flats, I might have been 100%.

I wanted to get these for my wife's SUV, but they don't make them....Overall, I will probably buy again, just not for the Mini.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Continental CrossContact UHP

Wednesday, March 28, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.


Continental CrossContact UHPReviewer's Overall Rating: 8.38

2004 BMW X3 2.5I
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle


Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 10,000
Location: MC LEAN, VA
Driving Condition: Average

Initial Review, 10,000 Miles on Tires
July 21, 2011

A great tire for drivers with crossovers and SUVs looking for excellent cornering stability and feel. Excellent feedback to the driver's inputs and predictable handling at the limit, with a progressive breakaway. Although not necessarily the grippiest tire out there, the handling characteristics overall more than make up. These tires handle wet driving conditions easily with excellent hydroplaning resistance even in the heaviest downpour at highway speeds. Stopping distances are very short for those emergency braking maneuvers. Drawbacks? This probably isn't the tire for those looking for ride comfort or all-season capability (it's a summer tire; I don't use it in the winter). On bad pavement, it doesn't absorb imperfections quite as well as less-performance oriented tires and although they're reasonably quiet, they're not the quietest ones out there. But for driving performance and handling, these Continentals are one of the top SUV tires out there.

Looking for the Best Value in a Street and Road Tire for Your Truck or SUV?

Monday, March 26, 2012 by Alex Mouroulis

Most truck owners never intend to take their vehicles off-road. Highway All-Season tires offer the benefits of a quiet, smooth ride. They provide excellent mileage and good grip in water and light snow conditions. These tires are built essentially for crossover and sport utility vehicles, as well as pick-up trucks and full-size vans. The following tires are a few of our top sellers in the Highway All-Season category and provide an excellent value.
 

Firestone Destination LE
Firestone Destination
LE
General Grabber HTS
General Grabber
HTS
Yokohama Geolandar  HT-S
Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S
G051


Take a look at what some of our customers are saying about their experiences with these tires:

"The Destination LEs came O.E. on my 2006 Explorer and I currently have 65,000 miles on them. I'll be replacing them soon with another set of LEs, but could probably squeeze another 3,000-4,000 miles out of them. I've been completely satisfied with these Firestones." -- Tire Rack Consumer Review, 2006 Ford Explorer Eddie Bauer 2wd (Firestone Destination LE)

"After 45,000 miles I could not be happier. Still have plenty of tread and the ride is as if the tires were new. I would not hesitate to buy another set based on this experience. By the look of things, I may get 70,000 plus, not bad for a truck tire." -- Tire Rack Consumer Review, 2005 Toyota Tundra Double Cab SR5 2wd (General Grabber HTS)

"I really like these Yokohamas. Good traction in dry weather. Ran into a horrible thunderstorm a couple of days ago and these tires performed like a champ. No hydroplaning." -- Tire Rack Consumer Review, 1998 Ford F-150 XL 2wd Pick-up (Yokohama Geolandar H/T-S G051)

I equipped one of my vehicles with a set of Firestone Destination LE for a few years and enjoyed the tire's performance. To see which tire is right for your vehicle, shop by vehicle.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Continental ExtremeContact DWS

Wednesday, March 14, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.

Continental ExtremeContact DWS Reviewer's Overall Rating: 8.27
 
 

2006 Mazda MazdaSpeed6
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle

 
Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 30000
Location: New York, NY
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 30000 Miles on Tires
February 08, 2012

This is my 4th vehicle that I've purchased these tires for. Ive been using this tire since the mid 90's! I swear by it. You won't get better high speed traction and cornering performance combined with wet/snow and ice traction. I currently have them on my 2006 mazda speed 6. These tires, combined with all wheel drive are unstopable! There is no need to mention dry / wet traction and cornering.... Top of the line. Whats great about these is the traction in the ice / snow! Iv'e driven through New England winter weather and New York Blizzards and ice storms, as long as the car is not bottoming out in the snow, I can make it, with minimal effort! Ive made it up steep icy inclines with no slippage, while 4 wheel SUV's slid down the hill. This tire is by far the best all season ultra high performance tire for under $200. While in the Army, I even had these tires shipped to Germany, while I was stationed there.

 

Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season Tops Crossover/SUV Touring All-Season Tire Survey Results

Monday, March 5, 2012 by Gary Stanley

When considering Crossover/SUV Touring All-Season tires, Pirelli is typically not a brand that comes to mind for many consumers. However, the same company that makes high-end performance tires for Porsche, Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Ferrari and others, also designs a fantastic tire for trucks, SUVs and crossover vehicles.  

 

The Pirelli Scorpion Verde All Season is currently the top-rated tire in the Crossover/SUV Touring All-Season category. It receives the highest marks in its class in several areas:

  • Wet Traction
  • Hydroplaning Resistance
  • Cornering Stability
  • Dry Traction
  • Steering Response
  • Light Snow Traction
  • Ride Comfort
  • Treadwear

While this isn't a tire designed for off-road use, it's a very smooth and quiet riding tire for those who drive mostly on paved roads. If you're shopping for the best replacement tires for your crossover, truck or SUV, this tire is definitely worth considering. 
 

Looking for Pirelli tire reviews on the Scorpion Verde All Season? Then take a look at our consumer reviews.

Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology Getting Rave Reviews and Awards!

Monday, March 5, 2012 by Steve Huffman

In 2011, Continental introduced their new Crossover/SUV Touring All-Season tire, the Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology.
 

The CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology is an ecologically friendly option developed to help crossovers, sport utility vehicles and light-duty pickup trucks perform on the highway and in mild off-road conditions. CrossContact LX20 tires are designed to enhance driving pleasure, save fuel and maintain grip when braking on wet surfaces, all while providing long wear and all-season traction, even in light snow.
 

The tire ranked first during our testing and is near the top in our Tire Survey Results. SEMA even awarded the Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology as the 2011 winner of the "Best New Tire and Related Product."

Here's a look at what some of our customers are saying about their experience with the tire:

"Since changing to the Continental tire, the road noise has been reduced in the cabin. It is a more comfortable ride than the stock tires and my MPG has increased slightly. I expect it would be greater with some longer trips. I highly recommend these tires." -- Tire Rack Consumer Review, 2009 Chevrolet Tahoe Hybrid

"Great tires. I enjoy driving my Cadillac SRX again. Noise level was substantially reduced." -- Tire Rack Consumer Review, 2006 Cadillac SRX 2WD V8

To see how this Continental tire can benefit your vehicle, watch "Testing Eco-Focused Crossover/SUV Touring All-Season Tires."

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Michelin Latitude Tour

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.

Michelin Latitude Tour Reviewer's Overall Rating: 9.1
 
 

2009 Kia Sorento 4wd
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle

 
Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 1000
Location: Trimble, MO
Driving Condition: Average

Initial Review, 1000 Miles on Tires
January 12, 2010

This is the worst winter I've seen in my over 40 years of driving. After missing two days of work not being able to get out my driveway in my rear wheel drive car, it was necessary to buy a 4-wheel drive. I was happy that Kia was using Michelin as original equipment, but I have to say that I was worried that the all season highway tread on this tire would not do well in the record snowfall that we've had. I was very surprised at how well this tire does in the snow, even in 2-wheel drive. The tires just seem to dig in and go. It's a blast to accelerate up a snow-packed hill in 4-wheel drive with a lot of confidence. I don't drive like a nut, and I realize that any tire has its limits, but I don't see a situation in which I would drive that I wouldn't have confidence in this tire. Besides being happy with its performance in the snow, it is a smooth riding, very quiet tire. I'm very happy with the way this small SUV rides and handles and I find it hard to imagine that there is another tire that would be an improvement for the way I drive. I don't do any serious off-roading, but considering the way the tires have handled this weather, I wouldn't worry about using them for an occasional trip off the pavement. I've only driven 1,000 miles so I can't comment on tread wear, but I wanted to comment on its capabilities while it's still winter. As of this writing, I'd definitely buy this tire again.

255/65R18 and 255/60R19 Tires

Wednesday, February 29, 2012 by Steve Huffman

Do you have one of these sizes? If so, you must own a GM vehicle. It appears these sizes were made by GM for the Buick Enclave, Chevy Traverse, GMC Acadia and Saturn Outlook. That being said, there aren't many options available in this size, however there are more options now than a year ago.
 

SUVs with the O.E. size of 255/65R-18 came with the Goodyear Fortera HL Edition, while SUVs with the size 255/60R19 were equipped with either the Michelin Latitude Tour or Goodyear Eagle RS-A.
 

Since these vehicles have been around a few years, it's probably time for many owners to think about changing tires.
 

Beginning with the 18" size, the O.E. Goodyear is not a bad tire, but I believe the Continental CrossContact LX20 with EcoPlus Technology (pictured) would be an upgrade over your current tire. This tire has good all-season traction, is relatively quiet and features Continental's low rolling resistance technology. This means that you should experience an increase in fuel economy. The other tire I would suggest is the Goodyear Assurance CS TripleTred All-Season. This tire has a more aggressive tread design and will perform better in the snow and rain versus the original Goodyear. Typically, these replacement tires are offered at a lower price compared to the Original Equipment tire.
 

As for those SUVs with the 19" size, the O.E. Michelin is also a good tire, but tends to be more expensive than some other options, while the Goodyear Eagle RS-A leaves much to be desired and suffers in many performance categories. The first tire I would suggest is the Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza. This tire is quite comparable to the Michelin, but at a lower price. It has good all-season traction and is also relatively quiet. Another exceptional value option would be the Firestone Destination ST. This tire features a unique and stylish tread design that performs quite well in wet and dry conditions.

Are You Looking to Get the Best Wet Traction and Hydroplaning Resistance from Your Tires?

Tuesday, February 28, 2012 by Zig Ziegler

The most important factor to consider in wet weather traction is tread depth. Even though their tires are not legally worn out, many drivers don't realize they may be below adequate tread depth to properly function in wet weather conditions. A tire is officially worn out when it reaches 2/32" of remaining tread depth, but after 4/32" of remaining tread depth your tires are recommended for dry roads only.
 

Hydroplaning occurs when a wedge of water lifts the tire from the road, creating a potentially dangerous situation. Hydroplaning is most frequent with heavy rain or high speed in wet conditions. It's the tires job to evacuate water quickly and efficiently to maintain contact with the road at all times. If your tires don't have sufficient tread depth the channels that evacuate water from underneath the tread will not be large enough to resist the wedge of water from building.
 

The tread design itself also plays an important role in wet weather traction. The directional tread design, also known as unidirectional tread, is one of the most efficient designs for water evacuation. Most directional tires have a V-shape tread pattern which can more easily push water from underneath the tire when compared to a typical ribbed tread design. 
 

Bridgestone Potenza RE970AS Pole Position
Bridgestone Potenza RE970AS Pole Position
Goodyear Assurance TripleTred All-Season
Goodyear Assurance TripleTred All-Season

Yokohama Parada Spec-X
Yokohama Parada

Spec-X


If you're looking for a safer wet-weather driving tire for your performance sedan or coupe, like a BMW 3 Series, the Bridgestone Potenza RE970AS Pole Position is my choice. If you have a touring sedan like the Toyota Camry I would recommend the Goodyear Assurance TripleTred All-Season, while the Yokohama Parada Spec-X would be a preferred choice for an SUV like the Ford Edge.
 

Shop by vehicle to find the tire that'll be best in wet weather conditions for your vehicle.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Bridgestone Blizzak WS60

Friday, February 24, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.

Bridgestone Blizzak WS60 Reviewer's Overall Rating: 8.25
 
 

2012 Audi S4 Sedan
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle

 
Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 400
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 400 Miles on Tires
November 20, 2011

Fantastic snow tires! I've owned Blizzak tires in the past and I've owned Dunlop snow tires as well, but these new Blizzak tires were day and night better than any snow tire I've ever tried. Yesterday I drove through our first snow fall in Minnesota. We had ice and then a layer of snow above it. These tires gripped the ice as if it was dry. Everyone else was driving in the right lane where the lane was a little more clear and doing about 20 - while I was able to just coast at 60 in the left lane on the snow/ice... When we got off the highway there was deeper snow in the town - these tires just rips and grips the snow like nothing I've seen... honnestly really impressed. I was undecided between these or a performance snow because I didn't want a tire that was too "soft" but even in the dry they felt quite stable, not all squirly like my other set of blizzaks were. Deff will buy these again. Heck - I easily out accellerated suv's off the line in the snow... love it! I do have all wheel drive which helps... stoping grip is superior and cruising stability in the snow is just solid as it could be.

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Yokohama Parada Spec-X

Friday, February 24, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.

Yokohama Parada Spec-X Reviewer's Overall Rating: 8.25
 
 

2003 Chevrolet Suburban 4wd
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle

 
Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 10,000
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Driving Condition: Spirited

Initial Review, 10,000 Miles on Tires
February 22, 2012

I bought these tires 2 years ago I use to remove them in the winter month's now I don't have to living in Texas I can drive on them all year around an I love handling of especially in wet traction they really perform on the highway in wet conditions you can feel the traction in the stirring wheel they are very attractive cleaned up with tire shine on them the speed rating is a plus in dry traction and handling in a full size SUV I'm already getting ready to buy a new set before these are thin I really love Yokohama products for trucks..

Big Mo
Slicka~Fly Recordz
 

 

Tire Rack Consumer Review of the Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza

Tuesday, February 21, 2012 by Tire Rack Consumer Reviews

The following post was created from content submitted via Tire Rack's consumer surveys. Information shown is the opinion of the consumer and meant to be used for comparison shopping purposes.

Bridgestone Dueler H/L Alenza Reviewer's Overall Rating: 7.73
 
 

2007 Mercedes-Benz ML350 Standard Suspension
More Tire Reviews for This Vehicle

 
Buy/More Info
Miles driven on tires: 45000
Location: Sudbury, MA
Driving Condition: Average

Initial Review, 45000 Miles on Tires
February 12, 2012

These are head and shoulders better than the OEM Michelins that came with the car. Those were quiet, but tramlined badly and were poor in the winter. These are the best all around SUV tires we've ever had. The only weakness is that they aren't as good as dedicated snow tires (New England, 2010-11 was a good test of winter performance). Highly recommended. In fact,I'm ordering another set this week.