Chevy Tires

Initial Review, 15,000 Miles on Tires
August 10, 2012

This is a tremendous tire! I bought two rear tires for my 98 Chevy Astro Cargo van RWD! So, this is really important, REAR WHEEL DRIVE only, and CARGO, meaning nothing in the back, not even the carpet, ultra light back and of this van. Bought two only because they were very cheap, and I just didn't want to believe that the tire is that good as all the reviews are very very good here for it. So I wanted to make sure if the tires are really that good and then buy 2 more. So, winter in Chicago, not to much snow as it should be but still, this van, totally empty cargo area, was doing just as good as in summer with completely dry streets. No skidding, I entered parking spaces that were not cleaned of snow with no problems getting out. Starting from a red light with absolutely no problems, in fact I leave all the vehicles behind skidding and trying to get a good grip. The only problem is the variety of tire size, but that's, I guess, how they maintain low price. Because now for my 12 Dodge Grand Caravan I have to figure a size to put since they dont make it in 235/60/16.
So I definitely recommend this tire to everybody looking for a winter tire. Noise is acceptable for a winter tire (in fact, like I said, I got only plain metal in the back, there's no carpet or any isolation to reduce road noise (cargo minivan))

Initial Review, 14,000 Miles on Tires
July 17, 2012

This car sees everything from commuting in traffic to light off-road. My previous tires were Continential extremecontact dws.When it was time for new rubber, I decided to go with a different size on the factory wheels. Oem 205/55r16, went with 225/55r16. The tires grip well in both wet and dry. They also communicate great at traction limits and react predictably when those limits are past. I haven't driven with them in snow yet, but have gotten through some sticky mud multiple times. These tires have done everything I've asked of them great. After 14,000 miles, tread depth is about 70-75% remaining. That's much better then most tires I've had. These tires seem to have the pefect blend of performance, durability, and price. I will buy these again and highly recommend them. A few of my friends have since put them on their cars. (06 subaru legacy awd 2.5 gt turbo 400whp, and stock 11 chevy camaro ss) They both think the same about them as I do.

Initial Review, 1,000 Miles on Tires
July 25, 2012

I replaced the O.E. Goodyear Eagle F1 Supercars with these tires because of the great reviews. I loved the supercars that were on my car even though everybody else hates them so I had high expectations for the PS 2's. Well, I wish I put the Supercar F1's back on the car !! The michelins are Great tires but I liked the handling, turn in response and the looks of the goodyears a lot better ! Dry traction off the line is better with the Michelins and they are a lot more quiet . A friend of mine has the Firestone W/O run flats on his 08 vette and I think they feel very close to the same as the PS 2's but are $500 cheaper ! Bottom line, if you like the feel and handling of the S/C's. On your vette . . . Stick with them . Chevy put them on there for a reason .

Initial Review, 65,000 Miles on Tires
July 27, 2012

I use my truck to commute to and from work, and in all kinds of weather. When my last set was getting low on tread, I realized I bought these tires about 65K to 75K miles ago!
During the NE winter of 2010-2011, I frequently drove wife and myself into work; at this point these tires had 35-45% tread left. That winter hit us so hard and unexpected, the highways weren't even plowed sometimes. So I ended up cutting my own path in 6-12 inch snow drifts on the interstate at 35-55mph depedning on the depth of snow. I just bought a new pair and am dying to go play in the snow! Its true the ride isn't Cadillac-smooth [brand new they are great] but I'm driving an old Chevy pickup so take that with a grain of salt. The price is pretty steep upfront, but unless things change with Firestone, I may never buy another brand for my truck. Bottom line, I'd refer these tires to my friends/family and anyone else I know.

Initial Review, 75,000 Miles on Tires
July 07, 2012

I use my Jeep to get wood for my wood heater and as a DD to and from work, the Grabber AT2 has NEVER left me along side the road or in the woods, I go places yanking a trailer that most Hummers would fear to tread and old Chevy trucks shudder at going and these tires hold up under ANY conditions, the only problem I ever had was once I jackknifed my trailer avoiding a idiot on a cell phone on ice and shredded one with e corner of my trailer, I have 75, 000 on teh remaining three and I am going to buy 4 more as soon as I can afford it.

Initial Review, 15,000 Miles on Tires
June 25, 2012

Very good tire. Keep them rotated and inflated, keep make sure your alignment is good (no curbs whacked, wheels bent, suspension arms bent). Definitely would buy again. Have these on my wifes car and shes no slouch behind the wheel either. Had FR380 in it, and those were okay, but didnt seem to have as long of a tread life. Stepped up to the FR710 and couldn't be happier. Guess thats why these are OEM on a lotta new Chevy Cars (some Malibus and Cruzes have them) May try a Goodyear next time, but strictly to change it up a little, Goodyears seem to ride a tad nicer but wear out faster... Guess thats the trade off.

Initial Review, 1,000 Miles on Tires
June 27, 2012

These tires replaced the factory original Michelin's. No comparison - the Conti's are superior across the board, especially in the two categories that mattered most to me, low ride noise and high comfort. They fit the bill and have taken the joy of the car to a whole new level. I don't care how long they last because for however long, they're a joy around town and on long trips.

Initial Review, 9,500 Miles on Tires
June 15, 2012

I put these tires and a new set of wheels on a 2008 Chevy SS 6L V8 Trail-blazer AWD for winter only. Traction in snow is great. "Rain" no problem. They corner better than expected. The ride is better and are quiter then the oe 255-50R-20" Goodyears. I like so much they'll stay on.

Initial Review, 25,000 Miles on Tires
May 15, 2012

The Chevy Impala is certainly not a sporty car. I think the Contis are performing very well for us.Travel 100 mi/day and have had no problems or handling/braking scares from tires. Bought tires for advertized quiet noise rating and they are very quiet. Winter tires are also Conti....very satisfied.

Initial Review, 600 Miles on Tires
May 05, 2012

I finally bit the bullet on purchasing these tires, 245/45/20. They are absolutely what the doctor ordered for these 2 ton plus Chrysler LX/LC platform vehicles. The handling, ride comfort are excellent thus far. There is more sidewall flex than I was expecting, but nothing that presents an issue. I'm experimenting with the air pressure for now, which is now at 34psi F&R vice the OEM 32psi which is not suitable for this particular tire on this vehicle. I have moderate power over OEM levels with 370rwhp/410rwtq along with a full Pedders LX Track 2 suspension. Overall these tires allow you to keep pulling with exceptional lane changing and speed burst control in both the dry and wet. As of now, I will purchase these tires again when the time comes. I'll remember to post an update at the 3000 mile mark.

Note: Michelin really needs to re-evaluate their pricing in the 245/45/20 size. They are too many vehicles that have this size, like the Chevy Camaro SS, Chrysler 300C, Dodge Charger, Magnum and Challenger R/T and SRT models. Just a thought.

Initial Review, 30,000 Miles on Tires
April 27, 2012

I was looking for a good tire to put on our Chevy Equinox that my wife drives 60% of the time. Decided on the Kumho Road Ventures APT after looking at the Tire Rack survey. At first I was Happy but as the miles added up I was not. The road noise was very high and the tires seem to wear uneven. Had the front end looked to make sure everything was OK. The Car Dealer not knowing I only had 20000 miles on them at the time say I should replace the tires.Well at 30,000 miles I still have those noisy tires on the car, everywhere we go I worry if the tires will make it. As soon as we can come up with the money to buy a new set of tires these Kumhos are coming off!!! And it will not be Kumho!

Initial Review, 45,000 Miles on Tires
May 02, 2012

These came factory on my '09 Chevy 4x4. I admit I don't rotate as I should however GM needs to rethink their pressure ratings. The back tires at 70 psi is way too much. My rear tires wore incredibly fast down the center of the tread. Once that started happening I backed off the presuure about 8 lbs. I always get the OnStar report every month saying they are low but GM isn't providing free tires. The front on the other hand at 45,000 miles look like they still have another 45,000 of life in them.
I figure with the rear replacements by the time they wear down again they will have evened up and all four will be due for a change.
I think the tires are somewhat noisy. I have the LTZ model so even with the extra sound insulation they still drone at highway speeds. Other than that they are average in everything, snow rain, mud. They are a high priced tire but I won't switch until all four need rplacing at the same time.

Initial Review, 1,000 Miles on Tires
April 20, 2012

Years ago I had a work truck, Chevy Silverado 2wd that I used in residential construction. I was SO impressed with this tire overall that when my '09 Dodge Ram 4x4 hit 40,000 miles the factory GY Wrangler HP's were toast. It is shamefull that a loaded 4x4 truck came with a glorified passenger tire, but it did and I never liked them. Sure the ride on dry paved road was smooth/quiet but thats it. Every other area of performance was awful. Even after siping it was only marginaly better in the rain. The reason I'm giving a history lesson is b/c if you have a Ram with the 20" rims sooner or later you will be reading reviews and looking for a real truck tire. This tire is it, stop looking and buy these! I'm still in the construction business and this truck is 50-50 work/personal use. It handles all aspects of paved road and is still very quiet rolling, smooth ride etc. At job sites no problem, personal use is frequent long road trips...once again VERY quiet and no MPG loss. I like the squared up shoulder blocks which help traction, add strength and just plain look good. We camp and I have no worries taking this thing off the road and on graded paths at preserves/state parks. With the HP's I was always worried about every small branch/foilage in our path. Although we don't do any "off-roading" you wont have problems with small rocks etc. I am less worried about a puncture now. There are a lot of tires on the market, if you want a solid tire firmly between a passenger/highway only tire and a mongo-mudder this is it. No regrets!

Initial Review, 73,240 Miles on Tires
April 22, 2012

These tires came with the car when purchased new. OEM tire pressures are low for my liking on the Malibu and we wanted to maximise fuel economy. I adjusted presures to 42psi front and 38psi rear. For comparison only, vehicle was driven in the SF Bay area, in and around northern Cal for the first half of the tire life with the second half in Phoenix Arizona. The 08 Chevy Malibu is not a performance car and is not meant to be driven like one, niether are these tires. If you want a performance car and tires buy a Corvette, Camaro, GT500 Mustang and hit the track.
The Chevy Malibu has been operated as it has been designed along with the tires that were put on it. They handle very good in wet and dry conditions and are very pradictable with good feedback through the steering wheel. In the twisty mountain roads such as driving to Yosemite in Northern Cal or up to Jerome in Northern Arizona these tires performed very well with no issues, even in light snow conditions. At Freeway speeds from 55mph to 80mph they handled great. City mpg was at 23mpg, freeway 31mpg with these tires. Tires have been rotated every 5 to 7k miles and wheel alignment checked if a problem was noticed such as a drift or pull when driving.
If a tire shop tells you not to buy these tires because there are better ones out there, they are just trying to push what they want to sell. Not what's best for you, your car and what it was designed for.

Initial Review, 30,000 Miles on Tires
April 17, 2012

Great tires, would buy again for my 98 Chevy Tahoe, look great also with 15x8 wheels. I would like to go to a 17 inch tire, but can not located this tire as the same in 17 inch. Thank You Very Much BF Goodrich for a well made tire.

Initial Review, 0 Miles on Tires
March 07, 2012

I have been looking to put some tires on my truck but i have not decided yet but I have had the Firestone R4S on my other truck and they where a good all around tire on my 1994 chevy k1500 4x4. Also tried the Firestone AT had good handling with both. Firestone should have kept both and corrected the so called caseing problem. As for the person who said his tires where smoking after a long haul probably had too much weight on axle aka overloaded are draging brakes that heated everything up. I drive a 18 wheeler and yes tires do get hot but not smoking unless brakes or draging. As for all the cracks in sidewalls a deeler showed me 4 tires they tested 2 where left alone 2 had tire treatments to sidewalls guess what, the ones being treated had cracks!!! I have had other tires brands but after seeing how much weight it took to ballance the tire made me wish i had stayed with Firestone. after all when you can drive a pickup your dad gave you with 37000 miles on it at 8+ years on the r4s when i got it. and it had over 1/2 the tread left. So yes I will be buying Firestones this Summer to go on truck that i just got.