Acura Tires

Initial Review, 500 Miles on Tires
March 06, 2012

Bought these tires as a replacement set for our 16-year-old's first car, a 2004 Saturn Vue Redline. The Redline comes with Bridgestone 245/50/18's that were replaced by the previous owner at a cost of over $1000 (several years ago). They still had a few miles left on them, but when your daughter is a new driver, you want a good set of tires as insurance. The BFG Spec T/A is slightly taller (.9") as it is a 55 series, but the GPS confirmed there is only a 2mph difference in actual speed (72) with an indicated 70mph on the speedometer. Other than that slight negative, the tires are an exceptional value. I bought from Tire Rack and a set of four were delivered to my home for $374 total. After having them M&B, I was still below $450. Less than have what the OEM Bridgestones would have cost.
From a performance standpoint, the tires have been a good choice. The extra sidewall gives the tires more "give" that smoothed out the ride a bit. The 245/50/18's were a little harsher over road imperfections. Road noise is diminished a noticeable amount. I would say they are 20% less noisy than the Bridgestone Serenity set was. Steering feels very neutral, not snappy or sloppy. Grip into turns feels good with good feedback in the steering wheel. Dry traction is very good and the tires track well, even though the 250hp 3.5 Honda engine and 5-speed tranny creates a bit of torque steer in the Vue FWD (2004 V6 models have the same 3.5 Honda engine used several Honda/Acura models). Wet traction is good, and the weight distribution of the Redline seems to help with braking in wet conditions that matches well with the Spec T/A. I didn't notice any hydroplaning at normal speeds (and I shouldn't with about any new tire). No snow driving has occurred so I can't comment on that.
With the few miles on these tires, I can't comment on longevity, but I feel they are an absolute bargain at the current price, compared to other brands. I don't think they are cutting edge but good, safe tires.

Initial Review, 4,000 Miles on Tires
February 29, 2012

I have purchased 2 sets of these tires from Tire Rack and I could not be happier. I replaced Michelins on my Mercedes ML and Michelins on my wife's Accura MDX. The tires are so quiet! Changed the noise level in the car dramatically in both vehicles. I would recommend these tires to anyone. I have about 4000 miles on my car and wear seems normal. I do keep up with tire pressures and will post wear levels at 1 year.

Initial Review, 1,000 Miles on Tires
February 21, 2012

I was very apprehensive about replacing the original equipt.Michelins on my Acura with a different tire, Price pushed me to Continental DWS.These tires are fantastic, Quiet, great in the rain,terrific feel when cornering. Highly reccomended.

Initial Review, 2000 Miles on Tires
February 15, 2012

I couldn't wait to get the factory tires off after about 10k miles, but wanted to squeeze a bit more out of them. I toyed back and forth with the Michelin's that are more "touring" but at the end of the day, the most comparable overall all season tire on the market for this size. Boy am I pleased with the conti's. I really cannot say anything that I would improve specifically, as nothing is all "10's" but this tire so far is extremely close. I heard the winter handling is exceptional, and I might believe this tire grips better with some rain on the ground than dry! It is truly unbelievable. The sidewalls people have said are soft, but I drive back and forth through NYC and Queens to Long Island and have hit my share of potholes. Nothing. Great tire with exceptional performance. And they look pretty sexy too! Don't hesitate if you are even thinking about it....

Initial Review, 3,000 Miles on Tires
February 23, 2012

bought the car used about 9 months ago. it had Kumho tires on there when i purchased it, i forget what the model of tires were but they needed to be replaced as they were down to the wear indicators on the tire. i put these on in december before we got any snow here in New Jersey. about 2 weeks ago, the beginning of Feb we got some snow. about 3-4inches. the tires performed well, even pushed them a little and was surprised at how they performed on some light snow. on ice, they were horrible, but then i don't know any tire that would be good on ice, unless you go with studded tires of course. For the small amount of snow we get here in jersey, these tires did fine. wet traction is also very good, hard acceleration from a stop, they gripped ALMOST as if they were on dry pavement. the corning is mediocre as the sidewalls are... soft, but i didn't buy these tires so that my car can turn as if it were on rails. comfort wise, they were a little stiff/jarring when i first had them put on, I'm not sure if i got used to it being like that or they softened up after a few months, but passengers that rode in my car said the ride is very smooth and comfortable, i asked them. noise, i hear the wind not so much the tires, i think the car has more to do with the noise, how well the vehicle is insulated, build quality and materials, Acura always does a good job. i can tell you they don't sound like mud tires on asphalt though. would i buy these again? yes. for the price, i believe these tires is an outstanding bargain. after having them on for almost 3 months/3000 miles they still look brand new. if the speed limit is 65, ill go 74. I'm pretty easy on the gas when accelerating, i utilize cruise control as much as possible. i can't say i was like this in my younger years, I've had my share of low profile tires and ultra high performance summer tires. these tires are more than suitable for my now, more refined self. i wouldn't hesitate to recommend these tires to anyone

Initial Review, 6,000 Miles on Tires
February 21, 2012

I bought this tire to replace a set of Michelin's. I didn't think anybody could build a tire better than the Michelin's but I was wrong. Saw the reviews and thought I'd give them a shot, having had some good experience runnin a set of Kumho's on my wife's SUV several years back. Well, not only do these have as good or better traction, they are much quieter and have a better ride than the Michelin's. I've run them in everything from mud and rain to light snow, with excellent results. These are really great looking tires too, and have gotten a lot of attention from Tacoma enthusiasts. They show almost no tread wear after over 6,000 miles so I'm reasonably sure that with care I can get 50K or better mileage on the set. These tires are an excellent buy and I'll definitely be replacing the Continentals on my wife's Acura SUV when it comes time to get new tires.

Initial Review, 400 Miles on Tires
July 22, 2010

I largely agree with the earlier review by an Acura TSX owner. I replaced the OE Michelins at 34K to try to improve handling, eliminate tire squeal and reduce highway noise levels. I put 300 miles on the Yokohamas in the first three days, mainly driving "spiritedly" on twisting Wisconsin rural county roads. I immediately noticed improvements in initial turn-in, cornering grip, and highway noise. The new tires seem to have cured an annoying tendency of the back end of my TSX to "waddle" for a split second when the rear suspension was upset while cornering hard. Quite stable at highway cruising speeds. They are only a little less comfortable than the Michelins. The Yokohamas definitely make the car more fun to drive and inspire more confidence in the car's handling than the OE Michelins. I think ultra high-performance tires would be too much tire for my car, given the limited capabilities of the TSX chassis/suspension. The Yokos appear to be a good match.

Initial Review, 1,000 Miles on Tires
February 17, 2012

Great tire for MDX. Very quiet, surefooted in wet weather, and handles uneventfully. Time will tell as to wear, however impressed so far. Stock Michelins wore out in about 30000 miles (very noisy the last 10k), replaced with Hankooks that wore out in about 25000 miles (last 5k VERY VERY Noisy), and now gave Continental a try. Will Update as miles pile on....Completely satisfied at the moment.

Initial Review, 18000 Miles on Tires
January 27, 2012

I waited until I have put enough mileage on these tires to give a review. All new tires with less than 1000 are always much better than the previous set you had, like a brand new car. With over 18,000 miles, these are still the best tires ever and sensibly priced ($100/tire). They are still very quiet, comfortable, good traction dry, wet, and light snow and wear evenly. I will buy these tires all over again.

Initial Review, 30000 Miles on Tires
January 27, 2012

After waiting 6 months for this backordered tire to finally ship I must say that my expectations were very high. These tires did not disappoint and continue to deliver superior performance every day. I felt honored when I saw these same tires on my friends Porsche.

Initial Review, 2000 Miles on Tires
January 24, 2012

Love the tire! Great performance-winters, nothing bad to say. They stay nice and soft in the cold, grip great on all surfaces. I went up a snowy hill right after a snow storm with several inches of ice right under the fresh powder, like it wasn't even there. These tires make me feel save and confident. Great highway tire as well.

Initial Review, 8000 Miles on Tires
November 09, 2010

This is my second set of oversize (225/50-17) tires, but compared to the same-sized Yokohama S4 the Continental DWS has a lot less dry weather grip and sloppy corning manners. The taller sidewall really does not work; perhaps more than just the "soft sidewall", judging from other reports, the OEM 215/50-17 would have been a better choice.



Wet weather performance is better, but the DWS hydroplanes - something the S4s never did until they had 25,000 miles! The change between the S4 (a tire with no wet or snow traction, according to me) was so noticeable I added a larger rear sway bar, which got rid of much of the car's new-found understeer and the low-speed cornering tire squealing. Then I had an alignment, which help a bit, with balance, but there was still no real grip. A couple of months ago I replaced the shocks and springs (A-Spec) and THAT has changed the car a lot, but there is still not a lot of dry cornering grip; severe axle tramp (on moderately-normal starts) in the wet in 2nd gear is now gone.



Originally, driving on DWS tires on dry summer roads was like driving on snow tires in summer - sloppy, mushy, with no cornering grip - but generally predictable - and tire squealing when starting and stopping. Now that it's turned cold (30-50F), however, these tires have changed: it's easy to balance the car (yes, a new suspension helps), steering response is good, turn-in is OK,...everything seems to work: is that sidewall flex or tread compound, or both? And of course, when it's wet the roads are cooler too, which seems to help this tire perform.



The tire is, however, noticeably lighter than the S4; the car accelerates better, and I find myself downshifting a lot less on the highway, when needing to move through traffic.

Initial Review, 8500 Miles on Tires
January 17, 2012

This is by far the best tire I had on my 06 TSX, There so quiet & I have just rotated them @ 8,500 miles, & they look great. I have had Yokohama & they were terrible.
I would buy this tire again! If you have a TSX I would highly recommend this tire.

Initial Review, 8000 Miles on Tires
January 17, 2012

The first thing I noticed when I got these tires was the tread pattern. It has a great combination of street vs lug tread design. The only fault I have with this tire is that I think it will only be good for severe weather for only half it's tread life. Otherwise I really love this tire and would buy it again if it is still around the next time I need them.
My comparison is with the original BF Goodrich T/A's which s--ked big time. With he Kumho's bouncing between expansion joints disappeared, turing the steering wheel is finally a joy, and I can actually hear my radio at a normal level. Yes the Kumho have made driving the truck so much fun even the wife is no longer afraid to drive it.
I waited to write this until I experienced every traction situation. For a truck dry traction is extremely good. Taking a spirited corner doesn't inspire white knuckles.
The next traction comments about wet, ice, and snow are based on the bed being empty. In the rain these tire hold the road very well and find pavement very quicly when the need arises. Taking off from a dead start will cause the tires to spin, but let off the gas and they'll bit the road. This is true in snow driving too. The tread pattern shed water quickly making puddles, large and small, seem non-exsistent.
Fresh deep snow is not nearly as challenging as light or packed snow. These tires behave very well in fresh snow. If I mind-my-manors the latter stuff presents no problems while out accelerate everyone. Yes I can get the backend to let loose, but it is very quick to straighten out and not wip side-to-side. I do love the fun things a vehicle can do in the snow. I have yet to push these tires beyound their limits which so far is pretty high. Yes I'm the guy you'd say going to end up in the ditch, but I still haven't found that one with my name on it.
My last comment is about the tires Rev's per mile. It's less the OE tires and therefore your speedo is going to be off.

Initial Review, 5000 Miles on Tires
January 11, 2012

Vast improvement over OE tires across all categories. Great combination of dry highway cruising and pulling through surprise snow squall on back-country mountain road, all during same trip through VT.

Initial Review, 23000 Miles on Tires
January 09, 2012

Great for the first 20,000 miles. No complaints, great tire. I have rotated every 5,000 miles as required; however, tread is quit worn. The life of the tire I would say is about 25,000 miles much less than that of what is advertised. At the price of $200/tire I would think it would have much more life. I was not planning on having to purchase a new set within 2 years.